Which movie do you think should win the "Best Picture" Oscar?

Total Pageviews

Friday, 21 May 2010

Flash Forward Finishing?

Why is it that every time I actually like a TV series enough to watch it regularly, it gets cancelled after one or two seasons? First the quirkily excellent Life got scrubbed, now it appears that the silly but enjoyably convoluted Flash Forward is being sent to the junkyard.

Is it just me??


CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Tuesday, 18 May 2010

It's A Wonderful Afterlife

I finally got round to seeing this today - I'll get round to doing a full review soon, but for now it's enough to say that I really enjoyed it, though it's often daft and quite surreal, so it won't appeal to everyone.  It centres around a mother slowly killing off the people who think her daughter isn't good enough or attractive enough to marry them / their relative, but the recently departed are not going to take this without a protest...


CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

The 3D Movie Revolution

Saw quite an interesting article about 3D movies, how they're made and the differing reactions to them over at the BBC website today.

Personally I think very few of the 3D movies I've seen in the last few years have really been worth it. Avatar's 3D effects impressed my wife but I didn't find them much good - though I saw it in 2D, some people have told me that Clash of the Titans actually looked worse in 3D - and the only movie I particularly remember enjoying the 3D effects on was Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs.

Then there's the extra cost, of course - going to the cinema is expensive enough as it is, without the added couple of quid to see exactly the same thing with unimpressive 3D effects. I've pretty much decided that I'm not going to bother with 3D movies (as long as they continue to be released as 2D simultaneously, anyway).

So what do you all think? Is 3D going to fade away like it did last time it enjoyed a brief flurry of popularity a couple of decades back, or is it here to stay - and if the latter, do you think it's a good thing?


CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Sunday, 16 May 2010

Movie Review - Robin Hood (2010)

It would be easy to think that Robin Hood's story is one that really doesn't need yet another retelling, but Ridley Scott's movie is nothing like any Robin Hood movie you've seen before.  Though most of the characters you'd expect are here - Little John (Kevin Durand), Allan A'Dayle (Alan Doyle), Marian (Cate Blanchett), Prince John (Oscaar Isaac), Will Scarlet (Scott Grimes), King Richard (Danny Huston)  etc - they are very different from the characters you thought you knew.

This movie's story starts off in France, with Robin Longstride being an archer in King Richard's army.  He finds out to his peril that, although Richard realises just how far he has fallen during his efforts to be "holy", the king is not a big enough man to accept the criticism that he asks for.  Robin and a few others defect from the army, but along the way they encounter part of a plot to destroy the English throne and claim it for France - though they have no idea at the time what they've really stumbled on.  Robin is charged with keeping a promise for a certain Robert Loxley - as those with a smattering of knowledge about the Robin Hood legend may guess from that, Robin ends up assuming his identity - though not for the reason you might have thought.

Ridley Scott may have felt that casting two Australians in the lead role for such a quintessentially English story would invite criticism, but unlike certain others, at least Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett make a real effort to sound like they're from somewhere in the region of Nottinghamshire.  While Crowe's accent isn't 100% convincing, he sounds authentic enough to be believable and Blanchett's accent, while not exactly regional, sounds English enough.  Both of them give strong performances; Crowe's Robin Hood is a man of integrity though not without flaws, and Blanchett's portrayal of Marian as a feisty, compassionate and frustrated woman fighting against the odds makes her both believable and sympathetic.

King John's character in this version is interesting - you never quite know if he's turned a corner from being an evil despot, though you always suspect he's up to something devious whenever he appears to be being nice.  Oscar Isaac plays this role well.  Walter Loxley, father of Robert,  is played by Max von Sydow who gives a great performance as an old man, now blind, stricken with grief but never willing to give up.  The slogan "Rise and Rise Again Until Lambs Become Lions", attributed to Robin Longstride's father and embossed onto the sword of Robert Loxley, finds its ultimate embodiment in Walter Loxley, who will fight for what's right against absolutely any odds.

There are plenty of other interesting characters in Robin Hood - interesting for how they're different from our established perception of them, and just interesting in themselves.  It's this and the constant changing of pace and mood from traumatic battle sequences with frenetic camerawork to personal introspection to romance to scenes of feudal injustice that make Robin Hood such a fascinating movie from start to finish.  With good period detail, great cinematography and plenty of intrigue as well as well-filmed battle sequences, what could have been a stale retelling of a legend becomes a fresh, vibrant, original re-envisaging.

The main villain of the piece, Godfrey, is played superbly by Mark Strong.  Strong is one of the most menacing Hollywood villains around, and after his slightly disappointing performance in Sherlock Holmes, he's back to his best here.  Matthew Macfadyen's Sherriff of Nottingham is reduced to a bit part in this particular version of Robin Hood, while Mark Addy steals every scene he's in as Friar Tuck.  William Hurt's performance as Marshal, one of Prince John's advisors, also stands out.

To me the movie has only one major failing, and that's in the development of Robin Hood himself.  His transition from a foot archer to horse-riding, sword-wielding general just didn't seem quite right.  Perhaps army recruits were by default trained in horsemanship and swordsmanship even if they ended up being in the infantry or archery;  maybe being leader of a small band of archers prepared him for greater things, or his impersonating a knight and the respect people gave him contributed to him becoming a great leader of men.  However neither idea really came through clearly and watching him charge along the battle lines on horseback, sword in hand, just never really seemed right - it was almost as if he'd accidentally wandered off the filming of Gladiator onto this one.  The claims of some that this movie is merely Gladiator in another guise are, in my opinion, way off the mark though.

Overall I thoroughly enjoyed this 2010 version of Robin Hood; it gives a whole new spin on the popular legend, and to be honest comes across as more likely as probably nearer the truth than the laughing cavalier type character we've seen before.  Of course, it helps that he actually sounds English (never mind that he's not, at least he sounds right!).

Robin Hood (2010) is rated 12A (UK)/ PG-13 (USA)for violence including intense sequences of warfare, and some sexual content.

Runtime:  140 min

------------------

Related Links:


If you want to actually be Robin Hood, you might want to try one of these PC Games:










CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Friday, 14 May 2010

Robin Hood (2010)

Just saw Ridley Scott's take on the Robin Hood legend... I'll do a proper review when I'm less tired, but for now it's enough to say that it's a really good movie despite a couple of inconsistencies.



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

BluRay Shmooray...?

During his recent press conference at FanFest 2010, stop-motion animation legend Ray Harryhausen talked about the new Bluray release of his ever-popular movie Clash of the Titans / Jason and the Argonauts (sorry, I can't remember which one it was now!). He and his biographer (Tony Dalton) said that, while recording the new commentary track for the Blu-Ray release, they found out the several scenes were going to be reduced / cut from the film. The reason for this is that with the higher definition picture offered by Blu-Ray, some undesirable picture elements (strings, mostly!) were clearly visible, whereas on previous releases no-one would have been able to notice them.

Is this a case of technology going forwards to the detriment of the film experience?!?




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Alice in Wonderland (2010)

Ended up seeing this tonight by default because, since we were a bit too late for our first choice, there was absolutely nothing else on that we wanted to see.

There were some good aspects to this; the storyline wasn't merely a rehash of the original, Tweedledum & Tweedledee and the Cheshire Cat were well conceived, Mia Wasikowska in the title role did okay and Helena Bonham Carter / Crispin Glover were quite fun as the bad guys. The visual effects were very good (though the 3D effects were really not very impressive).

On the flip side, Anne Hathaway as the White Queen was awful, Johnny Depp's Mad Hatter was annoying and his accent even more changeable than his accent in Chocolat, there was very little actual humour in the movie, and frankly a lot of it was just dull and quite boring.

Not one of Tim Burton's finest hours, though I admit that a lot of people liked it more than I did. I actually enjoyed the old BBC adaptation a bit more than this one.

Links:

Alice in Wonderland 2010 Trailer



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

The Karate Kid 2010 Trailer

Really not sure why anyone would feel the need to remake this... but I kinda like the idea of Jackie Chan as Mr Miyagi!




Links:

DVD Box Set Review - The Karate Kid I, II and III

The Karate Kid Remake



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Hot Tub Time Machine Trailer




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

The Backup Plan Trailer

Hmm... not sure about this one.




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Sex and the City 2 Trailer

Definitely something I won't be watching!




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Shrek Forever After Trailer






CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Space Chimps 2 - Zartog Strikes Back Trailer

I liked the first movie, but I'm not sure this looks like it'll be any good...




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Movie Review - Space Chimps (2008)

Since the sequel is out soon, I thought I'd post my review of the first Space Chimps movie here - which was much better than I thought it might be.

I wasn’t expecting too much from Space Chimps, but I was very pleasantly surprised by Vanguard Animation’s movie. Though the animation and images lacked the detail and sophistication of the bigger studios, they were vibrant and pretty decent quality throughout. Much of the dialogue was definitely written with adults in mind, and was sometimes very funny – it’s a shame really that I doubt if any adults who aren’t parents will consider watching this. There are several sci-fi references that will certainly have any skiffy fan chuckling – there are digs at Star Trek, Star Wars, and Armageddon along with a few others.

The main story revolves around a group of chimps who have been trained to get into space, but only manage to actually do this via the technological genius of Comet (voiced by Zach Shada). A probe investigating the outer reaches of the solar system encounters a wormhole, and a team must be sent to follow – but not humans, as it is too hazardous. The Senator (Stanley Tucci) agrees to using the chimps, but feels that there is something lacking from the trained astrochimps available to him. Therefore he recruits Ham III – grandson of the famous Ham (Andy Samberg), first chimp in space – to add some pizzazz to the proceedings. Ham III isn’t too thrilled with the idea however, preferring his life as star of the show at a circus.

Other characters include serious, Captain Kirk-like Titan (Patrick Warburton) and the ultra-professional Luna (Cheryl Hines), space chimps through and through, and Houston (Charles Alazraqui) who has guided Ham II throughout his life. There is also Dr Smothers (Kath Soucie), chimp trainer, and Drs Jagu (Omid Abtahi), Bob (Patrick Breen) and Poole (Jane Lynch). These last three are funny every time they come on screen. The voice acting is uniformly excellent, and the music (Chris P Bacon) is very good. The list of characters doesn’t end there actually – we are also introduced to the megalomaniac alien “Lord” Zartog (Jeff Daniels) and a small, big-headed alien called Kilowatt (Kristen Chenoweth) – well it’s Kilowatt for short, her real name is ridiculously long.

There is plenty here that young children will enjoy, though the frequent use of slapstick and pratfalls reduce its value for (most) adults, but a lot of the humour comes from the parody and dialogue. The film does tend to lag a bit in the middle section, where the romance between Ham III and Luna is developed in an all too familiar and predictable way, but it picks up again before the end. The competitive atmosphere that grows between Ham III and Titan doesn’t add much to the movie, but the latter’s predilection for awful chimp puns does (in fact you could say that it is chimpressive...) The plot is silly but rather enjoyable, and the alien race that this movie portrays is a lot of fun. The writing (Kirko De Micco and Rob Moreland) is good throughout, and the direction ensures a nice pace apart from the slight hiccough in the middle. Though he has written for various animated movies and co-produced 2005’s “Racing Stripes” (must get round to seeing that one someday), this was his directorial debut – and it certainly shows a lot of promise.

Overall Space Chimps wasn’t an amazing animated movie, but it was very enjoyable, particularly for science fiction fans. Though it’s not quite up to the likes of PIXAR / Dreamworks Fox [in terms of Ice Age - Fox released Space Chimps too) in the animation stakes, it doesn’t look bad and has a lot going for it. Recommended.

How to know if you’re a space chimp in four simple questions!

Titan: Are you in aluminium clothes?
Ham III: Yes.
Titan: Are you in a rocket?
Ham III: Yes
Titan: In outer space?
Ham III: Yes.
Titan: Are you David Bowie?
Ham III: Uh... no.



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Street Dance 3D Trailer

If you're a fan of dance movies, the style of dancing on offer or the stars featured in the movie, maybe you'll really enjoy it. For myself... I just have no words for how awful I think this looks! (Still, I have been wrong before...)




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Friday, 7 May 2010

DVD Review - Danielle Steele's "The Ring" (1996)

This TV movie based on the novel of the same name by famous author Danielle Steele isn't really my sort of thing, but I thought I'd give it a try anyway. Had I known it would be a rather gruelling 3-hour affair, maybe I wouldn't have! I didn't exactly dislike the movie, but I found it to be overlong.

The film stars Nastassja Kinski as Ariana von Gotthard, a young girl whose mother commits suicide and who, along with her father Walmar (played by Michael York) and brother Gerhard (Rupert Penry-Jones) plan to escape Germany.  Walmar is the vice chairman of a successful bank and doesn't like what Germany has become; he's managed to shield Gerhard from being forced into the army for a long time, but that cannot last.  After the childen help a friend Max Thomas (Tim DeKay) to escape after his wife is murdered by the Nazis, the von Gotthard's hatch their own escape plan.  Trying to avoid suspicion Walmar crosses the border to Switzerland with Gerhard and returns home to get Ariana, but he's murdered by soldiers before he can get back and the family's maid shops Ariana to the Gestapo.

From there it's a tortuous tale of Ariana wondering what's happened to her family, being brutalised by soldiers, finding love again, losing the man she loves, nearly dying, escaping overseas under an assumed name, finding love once more but losing it again, trying to find her brother, her brother's journey from Switzerland to Paris, finding love, finding out he's been tricked, Max getting to America and trying to find the people who helped him to escape all those years ago...

You get the picture.  The plot is complex and multi-layered, and despite a couple of scenes which seemed a bit too far-fetched, rather interesting.  Even though it's not really my sort of film, I did find myself getting drawn into the web of intrigue and caring about some of the characters.  The movie is quite nicely filmed with sets and effects much better than those in your average TC movie.  One of the main problems I had with it was the music - while it was good in itself, it was rather overbearing and tended to detract from rather than add to the atmosphere and intensity of several scenes.  It also occasionally made it difficult to actually hear what the characters were saying on a couple of occasions.

The performances were, on the whole, good.  The opening scene lacked the power it should have had due to the overbearing music problem mentioned above being ridiculous at that point, and Michael York, while making a fairly convincing German, struggled to convince in a couple of scenes.  Apart from all the angst and tragedy, the movie does make some interesting observations about the attitudes of the time and human nature in general.

There was the occasional lighter moment, though most of it was relentlessly oppressive in terms of atmosphere - however this was appropriate due to the setting.  I have a limited tolerance for movies being depressing; if you like movies based on Danielle Steele / Catherine Cookson books, you'll probably really enjoy this.  It's nicely made if a little too melodramatic. It's rated 12A (UK), presumably for the violence and sex scenes (which were a shade stronger than you'd expect in this rating of film).  If you like this sort of film then I think it's a good example of the genre; if not, you'll probably find the long sequence of tortuous nearly but not quite finding each other scenes too lengthy to hold your interest.  I fall more towards the latter category, though I can still appreciate that this is a well-made movie, much better than you'd expect from a TV movie.  (Not that it's inspired me to borrow my mother's Catherine Cookson DVD collection!  I think you can have too much gritty northern realism...)




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Clash of the Titans - Old-School Style...

My better half saw Clash of the Titans - the version with special effects by the legendary stop-motion animator Ray Harryhausen - for just £4 at Tesco yesterday. You can therefore look forward (or at least expect) to see a review on this blog in the near future!



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Thursday, 6 May 2010

Movie Review - Iron Man 2

I really enjoyed the first Iron Man movie and had hoped, given the quality of Spiderman 2 and X-Men 2, that the sequel might perhaps be even better. Sadly that’s not the case, it definitely wasn’t as good as the first movie in my opinion, but it’s not completely devoid of good points either.

With Tony Stark’s identity being known to all and sundry, it seems that the billionaire genius can do no wrong – or at least, any opposition from governmental figures or business rivals is weak and ineffectual. However it’s not long before a new opponent shows up, and this one is pretty tough... there are a few ghosts in the closet – Tony’s being slowly killed by the very device that’s keeping him alive, his business opponent is far more canny than he looks, Pepper Potts becomes Stark Industries’ CEO, a message from his father can save his future, Stark Industries has been infiltrated by another organisation, and Tony’s behaviour is turning his best friend into an enemy...


There’s plenty of intrigue in the plot, lots of different subplots... but ultimately the characters are too unlikeable or simply too uninteresting to really care what happens to them. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) comes across as more pompous this time, and his erratic behaviour is only half defendable on the basis of his personal problems (and occasional alcohol abuse). Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) spends almost her entire screentime being worried about or angry with Tony; understandable, but rather dull. Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke) is very destructive and menacingly calm under pressure; his reason for hating Stark is believable enough. Sam Rockwell gives a remarkable performance as Justin Hammer, Stark’s business rival who publicly appears completely out of his depth but privately is very cunning, albeit too trusting of others who are equally sneaky.

Then there’s Scarlett Johansson – who does very little until her ultra-destructive scene which, if the idea of Scarlett in skin-tight black leather kicking criminal butt is a real turn on for you, you’ll enjoy immensely. There are also the predictable “ooh she’s not got all her clothes on” moments that make up a couple of seconds of the movie. This along with the constant explosions and lack of proper character development show up the main weakness of this film – and indeed most blockbusters – the target demographic seems to be almost entirely teenage boys. Show a beautiful woman and make lots of things blow up, and viola! You have a Hollywood blockbuster.


There are a few scenes – too few – where the action is softened with some humour, and the film briefly soars in these moments. The first Iron Man had far more humour mixing in with the action, and was a better film for it. In particular Jarvis, Tony’s computer with a personality and voiced superbly by Paul Bettany, is good for a laugh a few times. The visual effects are great of course, ranging from high-tech devices to large-scale robotic battles, to Tony Stark creating a new element. The music is good – incidental music from John Debney working well in conjunction with ACDC’s rockin’ soundtrack.


While I thought Iron Man 2 could definitely have been better, it has enough good points to be worth watching. I’m doubtful that many people would consider it superior to the first movie (expect maybe teenage male Scarlett Johansson fans!).


Related Links:

Iron Man 2 Trailer

ACDC vs Iron Man 2!



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Going Postal

I hear that they're going to make a TV movie of Terry Pratchett's "Going Postal". Hogfather and The Colour of Magic have already had the treatment, though I haven't seen the latter yet and feel that David Jason wasn't really a good choice to play Rincewind (he was great as Albert in Hogfather, but just seems wrong for Rincewind... I can see someone like Mackenzie Crook being great in that role).

Richard Coyle is going to take on the role of Moist von Lipwig - I don't really know anything about him, anyone know if he's likely to be good in the role?



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Princess Io?

Hmm... looks like Gemma Arterton is going to be playing a very similar beautiful but slightly annoying character in Prince of Persia to the one she played in Clash of the Titans.

On a slightly less pointless note, Prince of Persia looks like it might be rather fun, in a "so bad it's good" sort of way.



CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Monday, 3 May 2010

One Spy Too Many (1966)

When I was a kid I used to love The Man from U.N.C.L.E., and I saw one of the movies today in all its cheesy sixties-style spy kitsch glory.  Robert Vaughn and David McCullum star as Napoleon Solo and Illya Kuryakin, who work for U.N.C.L.E. (United Network Command for Law and Enforcement) imder the supervision of Alexander Waverley (Leo G Caroll).  The plot is typically ridiculous - a self-styled modern-day Alexander the Great (played by the oddly-named Rip Torn) has stolen some gas from the US Army (who being good chaps are trying to prove that biological warfare can be a good thing!).  He plans to use this gas for a political coup, while along the way he decides to break each of the ten commandments in a specific way.

His ex-wife Tracey (Dorothy Provine) is trying to get a settlement out of him for a cool million dollars - so it's innevitable that her path will cross that of Napoleon.  It's all hokum of course, but it's also great fun. I seem to remember the TV series as being more fun than the films - perhaps because the scripts weren't really strong enough for feature-length productions - but One Spy Too Many was enjoyable nonsense nonetheless.




CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Sunday, 2 May 2010

The Great St. Trinian's Train Robbery (1966)

The fourth film in the St Trinian's film series, The Great St Trinian's Train Robbery was the first one to be shot in colour. Unfortunately though, while it still has the odd funny moment, it really doesn't match up to the earlier films.

The storyline is about the biggest mail train robbery, masterminded by an unseen "Gaffer" and lead by robber come hairdresser Alfred Askett (Frankie Howerd).  They rob the train, hide their stash, and await the call to go and collect the money.  Trouble is... the money's hidden at what has now become the new home of St Trinian's Girls' Academy.  Alfred enlists his two young daughters - who are perhaps even more corrupt than he is himself - to case the joint be enlisting them at the school.

Even Frankie Howerd can't lift this above the mundane very often, though Dora Bryan gives a great performance as Amber Spottiswood, the school's new headmistress.  The film is also graced, if that's the correct word, by one of the worst title songs in living memory. 

Not a patch on the first two films and not as enjoyable as the 2007 version, though probably infinitely better than Wild Cats of St Trinian's which I haven't had the misfortune of watching.  It has a few fun moments though; if it was to be given a school grade, it would probably be C.

Related Links:

The Pure Hell of St Trinian's (1960)

Blue Murder at St Trinian's (1957)

The Belles of St Trinian's (1954)






CaptainD - Movie Reviews Blog

Popular Posts - This Week

Popular Posts - This Month

Popular Posts - All Time